[Today s Event] 3 strings 1: Spanish U21 s paper strength crushes, Cairo National Competition has a more profound foundation (with sweeping)

Saturday 0098 European Youth Championship Spain 21VS Romani 2

Match time: 2025-06-15 00:00

Paper strength: Spanish U21 has a net worth of 262 million euros, significantly leading the Romanian U21's 28.73 million euros (about 9 times the gap). Spain's U21 has the foundation of winning the U21 European Youth Championship 5 times, with the highest value of 30 million euros (Joregisal, Moscarat), while the highest value of 3.5 million euros (Montenu). The huge price gap and championship background clearly show that the Spanish U 21 has an absolute advantage in individual ability and lineup depth.

Summary: The Spanish U21 has a crush on paper strength and significant advantages.

Recent record: Spanish U21 has 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss in the last three home games. Although the winning rate is not high, the opponent is strong (Denmark U21 is worth 110 million, Czech U2134.7 million). Romanian U21 has lost 1 win and 2 away in the last three away games. The only win was to defeat Portugal U21, which is worth 164 million, but the remaining two lost to the weak Finnish U21 (worth 20.18 million) and was blocked without sufficient stability. Although Spain has not won consecutive victories, it is more resilient to the strong opponents.

Summary: Spain's U21 is in a more stable state, while Romania's U21 has a big ups and downs away.

Offensive and defensive ability:

Offensive end: Spain U21 has scored 4 goals in its last 3 home games, averaging more than 1 goal per game; Romania U21 has scored 7 goals in its last 3 away games, but 6 goals come from the weak team Montenegro U21 (only worth 7.71 million). It has not scored against Finland and Portugal, and its offense is relatively low.

Defensive end: Spain U21 conceded 4 goals in its last three home games and had zero clean sheets; Romania U21 conceded 4 goals away from home and had one clean sheet (versus Portugal), but the defense line was mostly shots per game (only three shots per game in this game). Spain conceded fewer goals and had stronger opponents and better quality of defense.

Summary: Spain's U21's offense and defense are more balanced, while Romania's offense relies on weak teams to score points.

Event performance:

Offensive and defensive balance: Spain U21 scored 3 goals and conceded 2 goals in the group stage, with a goal difference of +1; Romania scored 0 goals and conceded 1 goal, with a goal difference of -1. Spain's offense and defense data are in general.

Control: Spain averages 62% ball control rate, pass success rate 89.72% (545 times per game); Romania has only 40% ball control rate, pass success rate 76.19% (357 times per game), Spain has crushed its control.

Offensive efficiency: Spain averages 15 shots and 8 shots (53% positive rate); Romania averages 12 shots and 3 shots (25% positive rate). Spain has a higher shooting conversion rate and significantly stronger offensive threats.

Summary: Spain has both offense and defense and has strong control capabilities, while Romania has weak offense and inefficient efficiency.

Confrontation features: Spain U21 won 3 times in history, scored 8 goals and conceded 1 goal, with the smallest score difference of 1-0 (2019), and the largest score difference of 4-1 (2022). Spain won 3-0 away in the last match (2023). Spain has a huge psychological advantage, and there is no draw in the historical confrontation.

Summary: Spain confronted and crushed, with significant psychological advantages; the two teams have no draw recently.

Comprehensive Analysis

Win draw: Win

Total goals: 2 goals / 3 goals

Half-game: Win

Score: 2:0 / 3:0

Unpopular warning

Low compensation changes: -0.69

5%+Institutions: 0

The average value of low compensation changes and the odds changes of most companies are relatively mild. This shows that the situation of the game is relatively stable, with low uncertainty, and the probability of unpopularity happening is small

Sunday 014 US Job New England Revolution vs Cincinnati FC

Match time: 2025-06-15 07:30

Paper strength: Cincinnati FC's net worth (60,050,000 euros) far surpassed New England Revolution (31,330,000 euros), and the world club ranking (605 vs 858) also has a significant advantage. The team's core players are worth more (Evander 14 million euros and Denkay 14 million euros), and the overall lineup is stronger.

Summary: Cincinnati has a significant advantage in strength.

Recent results: New England's last three home games: 1 win (2-0 New York City), 1 draw (0-0 San Jose), and 1 loss (1-3 Chicago), with a winning rate of only 33%. The opponent's average value is over 40 million euros, but the team lacks a stable victory. Cincinnati has gone away in the last three games: 1 win (1-0 Toronto), 1 draw (1-1 Columbus), and 1 loss (2-4 Atlanta), with the same winning rate but the opponent is stronger (such as Columbus ranked 342).

Summary: Cincinnati's away performance is more valuable and in a slightly better state.

Offensive and defensive ability:

Offensive: Cincinnati scored 4 goals in the last 3 away games (1.3 goals per game), New England scored 3 goals in the last 3 home games (1 goal per game), and the away team has a slightly strong firepower.

Defense: New England has 2 clean sheets (conceded 3 goals) in the last 3 home games, while Cincinnati has only 1 clean sheet (conceding 5 goals). The home team's home defense is more stable.

Summary: Cincinnati's offense is slightly stronger, while New England's defense is more stable.

Event performance:

Offensive and defensive balance: Cincinnati scored 25 goals, conceded 24 goals, strong offense and weak defense; New England scored 19 goals, conceded 14 goals, more balanced offense and defensive.

Control: Cincinnati averages 51% ball possession rate > New England 48%, stronger control ability.

Offensive efficiency: Cincinnati averaged 5.59 shots per game (14.59 shots), with a conversion rate of 38.3%; New England averaged 4 shots per game (10.93 shots), with a conversion rate of 36.6%, and the visiting team is more efficient.

Summary: Cincinnati has superior control and offensive efficiency, and New England has more rigorous defense.

Confrontation features: In the last 6 matches, Cincinnati has won 4 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with significant psychological advantages (such as 1-0 away win this season). Both sides have fewer draws in the last 10 games (New England's draw rate in the last 10 games is 20%, and Cincinnati is 30%), and there is a high probability of winning or losing in this game.

Summary: Cincinnati historical confrontation suppresses the opponent, and the probability of a draw is low.

Comprehensive Analysis

Win draw: Loss

Total goals: 2 goals / 3 goals

Half-game: draw/negative

Score: 0:2 / 0:3 / 1:2

Unpopular warning

Low compensation changes: -2.81

5%+Institutions: 4

Average of low compensation changes and the odds changes of most companies are relatively mild. This shows that the situation in the game is relatively stable, with low uncertainty and a small probability of unpopularity.

Saturday 015 Club World Cup Cairo Nationals VS Miami International

Match time: 2025-06-15 08:00

Paper strength: Cairo nationals are worth 49.65 million euros, ranking 55th in the world club; Miami International is worth 66.18 million euros (slightly higher than 13%), but the world ranking is only 579th, far lower than the home team. Cairo's national historical honor crushed its opponents (12 African Champions League champions, 8 African Super Cups, etc.), with significant team heritage and competitive hierarchy advantages.

Summary: Cairo's national strength is stronger on paper, and its overall reputation and ranking are superior.

Recent record:

Cairo Nationals (last 3 home games: 1 win and 2 draw):

1-1 draw with Pachuca (145th in the world), defeated the weak Pehayak 6-0 (3.48 million), and defeated Egypt National Bank 2-1. Although there was no winning streak, it remained unbeaten against mid- and upper-level teams.

Miami International (last 3 away games: 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss):

3 consecutive away points lost: 3-3 draws Philadelphia United (value of 36.95 million), 3-3 draws San Jose Earthquake (value of 38.33 million), and 1-4 losses to Minnesota United (value of 44.25 million). The defensive loopholes are large, and the opponents are all midstream and downstream teams of the MFA League.

Summary: Cairo Nationals' home condition is stable, while Miami continues to be sluggish away.

Offensive and defensive ability:

Offensive comparison: Cairo Nationals have scored 9 goals in the last 3 home games (3 goals per game), including 6 goals in a single game; Miami has scored 7 goals in the last 3 away games (2.3 goals per game), but most of them come from the offensive game. The home team has higher offensive efficiency.

Defensive comparison: Cairo Nationals have conceded 2 goals in the last 3 home games (0.67 goals per game), and 1 clean sheet; Miami has conceded 10 goals in the last 3 away games (3.3 goals per game), with zero clean sheets, and extremely poor defensive stability.

Summary: Cairo's national offense and defense are more balanced, while Miami's defense is fragile.

Event performance: Both sides are in the first round of the Club World Cup group stage, and the current points and goal difference are 0, and there is no direct data yet. However, Cairo nationals have been competing in top African events all year round and have rich experience in competitions; Miami International participated in the Club World Cup for the first time, and its adaptability is doubtful. Data such as ball possession rate and shooting efficiency have not been provided and will not be analyzed for the time being.

Summary: Cairo Nationals has a better foundation, and Miami International lacks high-end stadium verification.

Confrontation features: No historical confrontation record. Miami has a draw rate of 40% in all competitions in the last 10 games (3 draws in the last 5 games), while Cairo Nationals has a draw rate of 20% in the last 10 games (2 draws in the last 5 games). The away team is prone to a deadlock recently, but the home team is better at home wins.

Summary: The possibility of a draw exists, but the home team style is more inclined to score the winner.

Comprehensive Analysis

Win draw: 3}

Goal goals: 1 goal / 2 goals

Half-game: draw/ flat

Score: 1:0 / 1:1

Unpopular warning

Low compensation changes: 6.24

5%+Institutions: 13

The low compensation changes in this event showed a large fluctuation, and more than half of the companies showed that the odds changed by more than 5%. This shows that the event has extremely high uncertainty and the possibility of unpopularity is very high, and it deserves special attention.

Note: The article is only the initial view. The earlier time is due to the changes in data, which may affect the results. Please refer carefully. It is more stable on the spot. Next, there is a left small corner center of gravity analysis.