[Today s Event] 3 strings: Bottafogo is in better shape recently, and Cincinnati has more firepower on the offensive end (with sweeping)

Saturday 013 Club World Cup Palmeiras vs Botavgo

Match time: 2025-06-29 00:00

Paper strength: In terms of paper strength, Pamelas has a clear advantage. Pamelas's team is worth 252.55 million euros, ranking 23rd in the world club; Botafogo's team is worth 163.2 million euros, ranking 41st in the world club. Pamelas is worth about 90 million euros and ranks 18th in the lead, which is due to his rich history of honor (such as 11 La Liga titles and 3 Copa Libertadores). By comparison, Botafogo has only 3 La Liga titles and 1 Copa Libertadores. The higher value and higher rankings indicate that Pamelas is stronger in lineup depth and overall strength.

Summary: Pamelas has the advantage in paper strength.

Recent record: Assessing recent state, Pamelas has achieved 2 wins and 1 loss in his last three home games (6-0 wins Crystal Athletics, 3-0 wins Ceala, but 0-2 losses to Flamenco), and his opponents include the 20th-ranked strong team Flamenco. Botafogo has performed more stably in his last three away games, with 2 wins and 1 draw (1-0 defeat to Santos, 2-1 defeat to Carapopopo, 0-0 draw), and has faced Flamenco, who ranked 20th. Botafogo's two wins include the performance of drawing strong teams away and beating weak teams, showing that his recent form is more resilient.

Summary: Botafogo is in better shape recently and remains unbeaten.

Offensive and Defensive Ability: On the offensive end, Pamelas has scored 9 goals at home (3 goals per game), far better than Botafogo in his last three away games (1 goal per game), highlighting that Pamelas has stronger offensive firepower. In terms of defense, Pamelas conceded 2 goals and completed 2 clean sheets, while Botavgo conceded 1 goal and also completed 2 clean sheets. Bottafogo conceded fewer goals and defended more firmly in the away environment.

Summary: Pamelas has a stronger offense, but Botavo has a more stable defense.

Event performance: In this Club World Cup data, Pamelas scored 4 goals and conceded 2 goals, slightly better than Bottafogo's 3 goals and conceded 2 goals. Pamelas showed a more balanced offensive and defensive ability. In terms of ball possession rate, Pamelas averaged 45% per game, higher than Bottafogo's 34%, indicating that he has stronger ability to control the game. In terms of offensive efficiency, Pamelas averaged 16.67 shots and 4.33 shots per game (12.34 difference), Botafogo averaged 7.67 shots and 4.33 shots per game (3.34 difference), Botafogo's shot is closer to the shot and has higher offensive efficiency.

Summary: Pamelas has balanced offense and defense and strong control, but Botavgo is more efficient in offense.

Confrontation characteristics: In historical confrontations, the last 6 matches between the two teams show that Botafogo has a psychological advantage: Pamelas only won 1, draw 2, and lost 3 (such as Botafogo won 3-1 and 1-0 away games in 2024). The number of draws totaled 2 times (33%), which was a small draw, and Botafogo remained unbeaten in the last two encounters. This suggests that Bottafogo is more likely to gain an advantage at critical moments.

Summary: Bottafogo has the advantage in historical confrontation, with fewer draws.

Comprehensive Analysis

Win draw: draw/lose

Total goals: 1 goal/2 goals

Half-game: flat/lose draw

Score: 1:1 / 0:1

Unpopular warning

Low compensation changes: -1.75

5%+Institutions: 4

Average of low compensation changes and the odds changes of most companies are relatively mild. This shows that the situation in the game is relatively stable, with low uncertainty and a small probability of unpopularity.

Saturday 017 Club World Cup Benfica vs. Chelsea

Match time: 2025-06-29 04:00

Paper strength: In terms of paper strength, Chelsea clearly has an advantage. Chelsea's entire team's net worth is as high as 1.06 billion euros, far higher than Benfica's 363.5 million euros, with a significant gap in value. In terms of world club rankings, Benfica ranks 16th and Chelsea ranks 17th. Although the ranking is close, Chelsea's value advantage reflects its stronger lineup depth. In terms of team honors, Chelsea has won 2 FIFA Club World Cup championships, 2 UEFA Champions League championships and 6 English top league championships, etc., and has rich experience in international competitions; Benfica mainly focuses on domestic honors, such as 27 Portuguese Super League championships and 1 UEFA Champions League championship. Chelsea has a higher value and a heavier honor, and its advantages are obvious in this game.

Summary: Chelsea has strong strength and obvious advantages.

Recent results: In evaluating recent status, Benfica has more advantages. The home team Benfica has 2 wins and 1 draw in the last three home games (4-0 Tissens, 6-0 Aviš, 1-1 Portuguese Sports), and its opponents include Portuguese Sports (No. 22 in the world), which has a net worth of 511 million euros. Its unbeaten performance shows stability. The away team Chelsea's away record has only 1 win and 2 losses in the last three games (4-1 Yulgaden, 0-2 Newcastle United, 1-0 Nottingham Forest), and won against the weak team Yulgaden ($23.6 million), but lost to Newcastle United ($24, the world's largest), which is worth 651.5 million, and its away condition is unstable. Benfica won 2 wins (including draws against strong teams), which is better than Chelsea's 1 win, especially defeating or drawing opponents with higher value.

Summary: Benfica is in better shape in the near future.

Offensive and Defensive Ability: On the offensive end, Benfica is even more threatening. He scored 11 goals in the last three home games (4 against Tissen, 6 against Avich Town, and 1 in Portugal Sports), which is far higher than Chelsea's five goals in the last three away games (4 against Jurgaden, Newcastle United, 0 in Nottingham Forest). On the defensive end, Benfica is more stable, conceding only 1 goal at home in the last three games (1 against Portugal Sports), and achieving 2 clean sheets; Chelsea conceded 3 goals away from home in the last three games (1 against Jurgaden and 2 lost to Newcastle United), with only 1 clean sheet. Benfica conceded fewer goals and more zero-point shots, and its defensive reliability is stronger than the visiting team.

Summary: Benfica has strong offense and stable defense.

Event performance: In the current performance of the 2025 Club World Cup, the two teams have their own advantages but Benfica is more balanced. Offensive and defensive balance: Benfica scored 9 goals, conceded 2 goals, and goal difference +7, better than Chelsea's 6 goals and 3 goals (conceivable +3), showing that Benfica's overall offense and defense are more coordinated. Game control ability: Chelsea averages 62% ball possession rate, higher than Benfica's 52%, indicating that Chelsea can better control the rhythm of the game. Offensive efficiency: Benfica averages 15.67 shots and 7.67 shots per game, with a small difference (8 times), and an efficient conversion opportunity; Chelsea averages 14.67 shots and 5.67 shots per game, with a large difference (9 times), and a slightly lower efficiency. Benfica has better offensive and defensive balance and offensive efficiency, while Chelsea only has the advantage in control.

Summary: Benfica has balanced offense and defense and high efficiency, while Chelsea has strong control but slightly low efficiency.

Confrontation characteristics: In historical confrontations, Chelsea has an absolute psychological advantage. In the last four matches between the two teams, Chelsea won all the wins (including Benfica's 1-2 loss at home in 2013), proving its suppression against Benfica. In terms of the characteristics of the draw, Benfica has 4 draws in the last 10 games and Chelsea has 0 draws, with fewer overall draws, reflecting the tendency of the two teams to be clear in the victory or defeat. Chelsea's historical victory strengthens its confidence advantage.

Summary: Chelsea has obvious advantages in historical confrontations, but has a psychological advantage; there are few draws.

Comprehensive Analysis

Win draw: Loss

Total goals: 3 goals / 4 goals

Half-game: draw/negative negative

Score: 1:2 / 1:3

Unpopular warning

Low compensation changes: 7.66

5%+Institutions: 12

The low compensation changes in this event showed a large fluctuation, and more than half of the companies showed that the odds changed by more than 5%. This shows that the event has extremely high uncertainty and the possibility of unpopularity is very high, and it deserves special attention.

Saturday 024 US Professional Football Orlando City VS Cincinnati FC

Match time: 2025-06-29 07:30

Paper strength: Cincinnati's net worth 60,050,000 euros is significantly higher than Orlando's 41,130,000 euros (the gap is about 46%). Although the world ranking (578 vs 523) is slightly inferior, the price gap reflects the lineup depth advantage. Cincinnati has two 14 million euro attackers (Evander, Denkaiy), while Orlando's highest value is only 6 million euros (Ohdah).

Summary: Cincinnati has the advantage in paper strength, especially the value of the front line.

Recent record: Orlando has 1 win and 2 losses in the last three home games, with only 1 clean sheet for the opponent, and the loss to Nashville (valued at 36.53 million) and Chicago Flames (valued at 41.7 million) are both weaker than their own team. Cincinnati has won 2 wins and 1 loss in his last three away games, including a clean New England Revolution (worth 31.33 million) and a 3-1 victory over Montreal (worth 28.15 million), and the only loss is against the higher-priced Atlanta United (with 59.98 million).

Summary: Cincinnati has won 2 away games in recent away games, and its state stability is significantly better than Orlando.

Offensive and Defensive Ability: Orlando scored 4 goals and conceded 6 goals at home in the last 3 games, with only 1 clean sheet, and has a large home defense loophole (conceded 2 goals per game). Cincinnati scored 6 goals and conceded 5 goals in the last three away games, and also scored 1 clean sheet, but he averaged 2 goals per game on the offensive end. Comparing core players: Cincinnati Denkay (11 goals) and Evander (9 goals and 6 assists) have a stronger threat, while Orlando only Oheda (9 goals and 5 assists) has a stable output.

Summary: Cincinnati has stronger firepower on the offensive end, and both sides have hidden dangers in defense.

Meeting performance: Orlando scored more goals (36) than Cincinnati (29), but conceded similar goals (24) (25), and goal difference (12 vs 4) reflects the home team's more balanced offense and defense. Cincinnati has a slight lead in possession (50%) (47%) and has a higher conversion efficiency of on-the-point shooting (5.74) per game (Orlando 5.47). However, Orlando's pass success rate (84.41%) and long pass success rate (43.93%) were better than their opponents (83.43%/41.51%).

Summary: Orlando's offense is more efficient, Cincinnati has a slightly better control but the efficiency is not fully realized.

Confrontation features: Cincinnati has 3 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses in the last 6 matches, but Orlando has won all the games against Cincinnati in the last 2 away games (1-0, 3-1). It is worth noting that there are only one draw in the last 6 matches (0-0), and the remaining 5 games have averaged points and a total of 4 goals have been ≤ 3 goals, reflecting the confrontation style being conservative and pragmatic.

Summary: Cincinnati has a slight psychological advantage, but the confrontation has many points and limited goals.

Comprehensive Analysis

Win draw: Loss

Total goals: 3 goals / 4 goals

Half-game: draw/negative

Score: 0:3 / 0:4

Unpopular warning

Low compensation changes: -2.53

5%+Institutions: 3

The average value of low compensation changes and the odds changes of most companies are relatively mild. This shows that the situation in the game is relatively stable, with low uncertainty and a small probability of unpopularity.

Note: The article is only the initial view. The earlier time is due to the change in data, which may affect the results. Please refer carefully. It is more stable on the spot. Next, there will be a left small corner center of gravity event score