The problem of the Premier League promoted team: lying flat or striving for progress?

With Leeds United, Burnley and Sunderland locking in next season's Premier League qualification, a realistic question lies in front of these three teams: should we risk the risk of being wasted and burning 100 million pounds to seek relegation, or should we take the money into our pockets as a lift?

Leeds United, Burnley and Sunderland returned to the Premier League for two consecutive seasons, and all the promoted teams that year were relegated from the Premier League! This year it was Leicester City, Ipswich and Southampton, and last year it was Luton, Burnley and Sheffield United. Especially this year, Leicester City, 18th, is 13 points behind Tottenham, 17th, and the 13-point gap is surprising!

This season, Leicester City coach Van Nie expressed an interesting point. He believes that the 17 existing teams in the Premier League are getting stronger and stronger: "The longer these 17 teams stay in the Premier League, the more they make, and they can buy better players with more money. The gap between the newly promoted team and the 17 existing teams in the Premier League is increasing.

Van Nie believes that the gap between the newly promoted team and the 17 existing teams in the Premier League is increasing. The last updated team who can relegate was Nottingham Forest in the 22/23 season. They spent 100 million pounds that season, almost replaced the entire team, and finally relegated.

Two years ago, Hao spent 100 million to relegate successfully!

So, being an elevator team seems to be a good choice? After all, in the Premier League, the broadcasting share was at least 100 million pounds. Even if it was relegated, it could still receive a relegation subsidy of about 40 million pounds every year for three consecutive years with the "parachute" policy. In these three years, if you can successfully advance to the Super League, you can make a lot of money in the Premier League!