It s normal for Liverpool to lose. Slott s dismissal can t solve the problem because there s something wrong with the lineup structure.

Liverpool lost again, but this is quite "normal". If this Liverpool team can still win, it will be called a ghost! It's a routine operation for Manchester City to lose. Newcastle are at home, and everyone knows it, so let's focus on Liverpool. Everyone knows that Liverpool has a problem? wrong! In fact, the problems of this team cannot be solved by changing the coach. It will be useless to change anyone!

Coach Slott can’t save the situation even after class is over. Liverpool's problems have been "monstering" since the signings and contract renewals in the summer. Wirtz came because the team needed a frontcourt core, okay, I barely understood it; Ekitic came because Nunez was leaving and had to find a new center, which makes sense; but when Isaac came, he was short of a backup center? What's going on with Liverpool that the whole "data brush" has to come back? Look at his data at Newcastle. His goals are all dependent on the midfield and the frontcourt. When he gets to Liverpool, is this pie still enough? So when the team introduced Isaac, it was better to introduce a defender and rotating wingers, so that the current problem would not be so troublesome.

There is no problem for Salah to renew his contract, but with Dias gone, the side is directly "lame", and his level has declined faster than the stock market. Many teams now defend Salah just like they defend against thieves. Liverpool will not be able to attack, and the midfield and backcourt are also full of loopholes. McAllister and Szoboszlai's interception ability has declined, and Hrafenberch's defense is also poor. Those who don't know better think they are playing "health football"! So the current situation is that Liverpool is missing too many players on the wing, and the team does not seem to have found a suitable successor. Now everyone on the wing knows how to defend, after all, Salah is the only player you can use.

This is Slott's problem. These three were not so good last season. Could it be that the tactics were changed to pass and control, which made the players unable to play football? Van Dijk and Konate, Konate's mentality is wandering, his contract is about to expire, and his thoughts are far away. This is simply "making matters worse" for Liverpool, which has no central defender rotation. What's the use of changing coaches now? Restore last season's style of play? Don't be ridiculous, Dias is gone, and there is no one on the bench who can score a goal. When Isak was first introduced, many people said that he should buy a central defender and a defensive player. Now it seems that if he buys a defensive player and adds a wing substitute, many problems may be solved. And Wirtz, if he wants to be the core, he may have to practice more. Salah is even worse. Without a "little assist expert" like Arnold, he can only rely on himself, although Arnold's defense is not very good. In short, for Liverpool now, changing the coach is "changing the soup without changing the medicine", and the lineup configuration is the big problem!

There is no point in cheering for the coach. This team now needs to recover its wing players, bring in new players at center back, and determine the core in the frontcourt. There is no chance of winning the championship anyway, so it’s time to determine who its core is.