Club World Cup controversy? Manchester City s handball score is still valid + VAR has not intervened! The referee was angrily scolded: Money has been collected

On July 1, a focus match in the 1/8 final of the Club World Cup began. Manchester City and Riyadh Crescent, the two major European and Asian teams, ushered in a direct dialogue. Just 9 minutes into the game, Manchester City took the lead with a lightning lead, but this goal is quite controversial.

At that time, Manchester City organized an attack and hit the wall to cooperate. New aid Ait Nuri dribbled the ball into the penalty area, but the ball hit his arm without bias. Although the New Moon player raised his hand to protest, the referee signaled that Manchester City's offense would continue. In the end, Ait Nuri made a cross to create a civil war in the penalty area, and B got the ball and scored in stoppage time.

Although Neves and other New Moon players still refused to negotiate for a long time, the referee on duty still made a penalty and scored a goal. The referee firmly believed that Ait Nuri's arm was not opened but was close to his body, which was an unintentional handball.

And what is incredible is that VAR has never intervened. While the new moon coach Xiao Inzaji was angry about this, he was helpless.

Regarding this controversy, many netizens complained: "Is the referee taking the money?": "Is this obvious handball going to be taken to Manchester City to win the championship?": "Although the arm is tightly attached to the torso, the obvious handball profit is not blown away, which is simply incredible!": "The offensive party will have to be punished once the handball is opened, right?"