Beijing Guoan 2-2 Tianjin Jinmen Tiger, post-match rating: Not the number one in the subway bird, Tianjin No. 9 ranked first

"It is said that the home court is a iron-clad battle, but last night the Working Team seemed to have stolen the keys by the visiting team."

When everyone was waiting for Guoan's foreign aid to carry the whole game, the first place in the score list was snatched away by Tianjin No. 9 Keeles - this plot is more exciting than scoring a goal.

2 to 2, the score is not unusual. What is strange is:

Guoan has the advantage in possession of the ball, but was punched through twice;

Tianjin has fewer shots, but leads twice;

The best in the game is not the highest value, but the Keeles who was called "parallel" by some fans before the game.

In a word - data can deceive people, scenes can also deceive people, only the goal will not lie.

The suspense starts from the 20th minute.

Hadas's seemingly random pass in the backcourt, like a stone thrown into the water, causing a thousand waves.

Killes made a single shot, without accelerating or pretending to move, and just relying on a bad rhythm, he shook Hou Sen into a background board.

The stands were quiet, and Guoan fans were shocked: This script is wrong.

43 minutes, the corner kick of the bird was found in Dawan and the header hit the board.

1 to 1, it seems to have equalized the momentum, but people who understand the ball have already smelled the hidden danger:

Guoan's goal relies on set balls, and the sports war is still full of thunder and raindrops.

And Tianjin's killer move is still the "quick knife". In the second half, Tianjin replicated the taste of the first half with just three kicks.

Ademido shooting post, Keeles made up the empty goal - the same set of punches, but Guoan still couldn't avoid it.

At this time, the decibels of the Workers' body dropped by half, and everyone began to mutter:

"Are our defenses paper?"

71st minute, Nabijiang made a cross, and Fabio nodded and headed the ball, 2-2.

scores were tied, but their enthusiasm was not settled.

Guoan fans applauded, but were more afraid:

If the mid-post was two centimeters further inward, it would be a reversal of the tragedy tonight.

scores are released, Keeles 8.2, and Pierbird 8.0.

The number is cold, but it is like a slap in the face:

The expensive ones are not necessarily easy to use, but the easy ones are definitely seen.

Killes shot three times in the game, two shots on the right side, and two goals, with an 85% pass success rate.

is simple, direct and efficient, just like our workers' desire to survive by "paying the greatest results with the minimum cost".

In contrast, Guoan has a good ball possession rate, but most of the threats to the ball rely on personal abilities.

Zhang Yuning scored 6.4 points, Lin Liangming scored 6.6 points, the forward group portrait was not twisted into a rope.

Someone in the fan group complained: "The frontcourt is like a WeChat group, everyone talks about their own things."

The words are rough and not rough. Football is a sport of 11 people, not 11 APPs.

Write this, victory or defeat is no longer that important.

Importantly, we see another "unliked" team, using concise logic to overturn paper strength.

also saw a team that was "ambition to compete for the championship" tripped twice by the same question.

In the next round, will Guoan still dare to continue betting on set pieces?

Will Tianjin upgrade the counterattack routine?

Should we fans continue to scold the defense, or should we hold a "Tucao conference" for the forwards?

Leave the message area for you.

Do you think, who should take the blame the most in this draw, and who should be praised the most?

Perhaps, the answer lies in the next cry of you and I.