Former Cavaliers teammate revealed! In order to get the ball back, James excluded Irving from trading Witters

After James returned to the Cavaliers, the then boss of the team, Irving and the second-in-command Vites, were very dissatisfied and rejected the "traitor" who once abandoned Cleveland to lead the Cavaliers again. In order to get the ball back, James deliberately played badly and let the team lose the game, causing the pressure of public opinion to fall to Irving's side, forcing Irving to give up the ball. etc! Everyone is a little familiar with this, and did James also force Wade to give up his ball rights in 2011.

There are also deliberately humiliating the ball that would not play without the ball on the court, forcing the team to trade with Waiters. In the end, James successfully "accomplished" the Cavaliers. Heywood said in an interview that James always preached Irving and complained that Irving had held the ball for too long. Haywood believed that at that time Irving and Waiters did not want James to lead the team, and the combination of Irving and Waiters was considered the most promising backcourt combination in the future, even comparable to Curry and Thompson. However, James' arrival made them both play in a very uncomfortable way. James's most clever way was to deliberately let the team lose in exchange for public opinion to turn to Irving and Waiters, so that he could do what he wanted!

In fact, there is no need to be revealed in these things. After seeing James' performance on the court, you will know that he is not defending with his hips, and his teammates hold the ball and stand near the center line. There was once a game where when I first returned to the Cavaliers, Irving did not pass the ball, so he walked back to the bench and left his teammates on the field to play four or five.

Everyone who watched the ball knew that James had no right to play, so the Cavaliers had no choice but to trade Waiters, and Irving completely lost the right to play. James' usual trick is to watch the show with his hips first, so that Irving can't win the ball by 4-5, and then take the ball back and tell Irving how to win the ball by 5-5. If Irving also watches the show with his hips, he can still win 4 and 5, so he can prove that James is good through the control variable method and it is correct to get the ball back. Otherwise, this can only prove that Irving is shameless and can’t act!

Some people say that James actually doesn't want to watch the show, and James really doesn't know how to play without a ball. If you hold the ball, it is much simpler to deal cards like Green, and it is much easier to hold the ball without the ball. James can't do it like a point guard, so in the end, James can only hold the ball at the top of the arc if he wants to show value in the team. I agree with this sentence very much. For example, in terms of hindsight, Ross, Delon, Irving, Wade, Russell, Westbrook were also put on by James. Ross wanted to retire when the Cavaliers played, Delon and James cooperated, and there was no such person directly. Irving was considered a smart person and broke with James and ran away directly. Wade everyone knows what happened. After Russell and James cooperated, he has directly fallen from a maximum salary to a middle-class contract. Not to mention Westbrook, there is no one who has been cheated by James!

James has played for more than 20 years, and he can't play without a ball or attack. He can play a game mode. I don't say it, everyone knows it. At this time, someone refuted, who said James would not play without a ball? You should know that even if his teammates hit 0 with 1-0 in a fast break, he would go up to grab those 2 points, so why wouldn’t he play without a ball? In fact, James only cares about himself and not the team, so James hopes that there will be obedient superstars so that James can win and have data!