2.35 million in one year, he returns to the Lakers! Pelinka has no problem with his operation. Will Reeves change center next?
Who will join the Lakers this summer? At present, Pelinka's recruitment work is not going well. It is very important that the league teams are hostile to the Lakers, and in addition to this, they have limited bargaining chips. From another perspective, who will leave the Lakers this summer? At present, Hachimura Shizuo was seen in the transaction rumors involving Wiggins and John Collins. In addition, if you want to exchange for centers like Kessler and Durham who are on rookie contracts, Kneckett will definitely be let go. Apart from that, we cannot ignore Finney Smith. Hold the player option in hand. If you jump out of the contract, you will not rule out that Pelinka will not renew the contract if you ask for an excessively large contract. If the player option is executed, there are rumors that the Rockets will use "White Devil" Whitmore and Landale to quote the former. Obviously, Finney Smith's stay or not also needs to be questioned. At the same time, according to the NBA China official website, the Lakers have implemented Goodwin's team options next season. To put it more, the contract amount is 2.35 million yuan per year. Will Goodwin's return to the Lakers have an impact on the team? From the perspective of immediate combat power, as a basic salary player, Goodwin's impact on the team is insignificant. However, from a strategic and tactical perspective, there are still influences. First, enthusiasm. Goodwin interfered with the opponent's shooting performance with 4.6 times per game, which shows that he was very active on the defensive end. In addition, the average 0.5 live ball competitions per game also shows the enthusiasm - the Lakers ranked first in the same period. Second, infectiousness. When Goodwin was on the court, compared with his average of 113.8 points per game, the Lakers could lose 2.4 points less in a hundred rounds. Obviously, Goodwin was active and proactive on the defensive end and infected his teammates on the court. To sum up two points, it is true that Goodwin is almost useless on the offensive end, but he is still worthy of the basic salary on the defensive end. From this perspective, Pelinka had nothing to do with Goodwin's operations. I mean, everyone signs for basic salary signs - most of them are those who raise their heads, but Goodwin is still worth a little at least on the defensive end. After executing Goodwin's contract, we are waiting for Finney Smith to execute the player option. The next step, I think it's time to exchange Reeves for the center. Is it a pity for the Lakers to give up Reeves? How do you think about this? If it is the premise of a one-year, 14 million contract, unless it is a young center like Kessler with both potential and combat power, it will definitely be a loss. Let me just say one thing: playoffs, Reeves 0.214 points/round and Chet 0.241 points/round. Even in the playoffs with the worst performance in his career, Reeves' scoring efficiency is not much different from the champions' three leaders. In other words, it is very cost-effective with the support of a contract. But the problem is that judging the Lakers' early contract renewal of 90 million in the past four years, Reeves is pursuing a large contract with an average salary of at least 30 million. This will be a very declining price-performance ratio in my opinion: First, the defensive end has always been Reeves' biggest drawback, and this is also very different due to its size; secondly, Irving and the Mavericks reached a three-year, 119 million early contract renewal. To put it bluntly, Reeves' offense is strong, can Irving be strong? Whether compared with Irving or his own shortcomings, Reeves' cost-effectiveness can only be left before renewing the contract. Therefore, it is not a pity for the Lakers to give up Reeves. Reason: Contract. Reeves will definitely jump out of the contract tomorrow. Not to mention whether the Lakers can keep it, but this cost-effective advantage will be gone. In this way, it is better to sell while the value is at a high point, so that you can strengthen the inside line. To take a step back, if you pursue a big contract and stay in the team, you will have nothing. Finally, let's wait and see which center Reeves can get.
- Recent Posts
-
- Harry s magic failed, and the
- Warriors official showcases th
- Brunson: Have confidence in te
- Media Person Zhou Peng: Tomorr
- Zhongqiao Sports uses China To
- From applying for a deal to be
- Refused to get out 1-4! Brunso
- Amazing debut! Yang Hansen sco
- Tomorrow s Battle! Thunder Tim
- Mavericks are interested in Wi
- Hot Posts
-
- In the first round, the Hawks
- Billionaire! Yang Hansen, the
- Clippers officially announced
- NBA Draft Expert: If I were a
- Durant joins the Rockets best,
- Yang Hansen went to Las Vegas
- Bill executes the trade veto a
- Trail Blazers coach Billups pr
- Reject the Rockets? It is reve
- 16th pick in the first round!
- Wesley Johnson, the first roun
- Only internal potential + no m
- A beautiful Chinese player too
- Should the Rockets trade the N
- Jokic is unprecedented, will Y
- 5.2 million, the first choice
- FMVP ranking update: Alexander
- 50 players withdrew from the N
- Strong willingness! Durant has
- Champions League seven! Hallib
- search
-
- Links
-