Lise Sports > Basketball > 18 million in one year vs. 11 million in one year! Who is the Lakers? The answer is clear at a glance but there is no choice

18 million in one year vs. 11 million in one year! Who is the Lakers? The answer is clear at a glance but there is no choice

According to the NBA China official website, the Pelicans are evaluating the value of all players in the team, in other words, there is no non-selling product.

has an additional reinforcement target, which is obviously very good for the Lakers.

Pellinka can chase Troy Murphy from an offensive perspective. To a large extent, he can be regarded as a "elongated version" of Reeves.

Ball-holding comparison:

1. Murphy shot 220 times with the ball, with a shooting rate of 40.5%;

2. Reeves shot 396 times with the ball, with a shooting rate of 38.4%.

No ball comparison:

1. Murphy received 294 shots, with a shooting rate of 40.1%;

2. Reeves received 293 shots, with a shooting rate of 39.3%.

Apparently, Murphy has better ball-free ability than Reeves.

Pellinka can chase Herbert Jones from a defensive perspective. To a large extent, the younger version of Caruso can be seen.

Defensive efficiency:

Regular season, Jones accounted for 56% of the defender, 34.7% of the defender, and 9.3% of the defender's shooting rate limiting the opponent's shooting rate from 50% to 46.2%. Caruso accounts for 54.5% of defenders, 36.6% of defenders, and 8.9% of defenders, limits his opponent's shooting rate from 46.7% to 39.3%.

In addition, Jones was selected as the second team of defensive team of the year last season, together with Caruso, White, Holiday and Sargers. In other words, Jones also has the defensive characteristics and abilities Caruso has.

Of course, whether Murphy, Jones or other players, the Lakers have to pay chips if they want to get it. I mean, in addition to draft picks, there are also player chips, among which we have to mention Hachimura and Vincent. After all, the two are expiring contracts.

18 million Hachimura vs. 11 million Vincent, who will the Lakers choose?

From the perspective of immediate combat power, Hachimura scored 775 points and a shooting rate of 50.9% in the season. When he was on the court, the team won 2.1 points more in a hundred rounds; Vincent scored 460 points and a shooting rate of 40.0%, and when he was on the court, the team lost 1.2 points in a hundred rounds.

Obviously, the Lakers' preferred is Vincent. To put it bluntly, the team is in a loss when it is on the court. From another perspective, there is almost no importance to the team.

From a position perspective, Hachimura in 203 is a standard forward line and can even play in the fifth position of the small ball. Vincent of 188 can only play as a defender, to be precise, No. 1 position.

From an attractive perspective, looking at the league, whether it is the Knicks, Thunder, Timberwolves who are rushing to the championship, or the Wizards, Hornets, Jazz, etc., the demand for the forward is far greater than that of the defenders. Simply put, under the same conditions, the forward line provides more technical and tactical support than the defender.

This is like the Pacers. Halliburton is obviously the absolute core of the team, but the MVP in the East Finals gave Siakam. It is very important that the latter, as the forward, is more important to the team than the former - when Sika is on the court, the team has a net victory of 9.6 points in 100 rounds, Harry has 8.9 points, and when Sika is not on the court, the team has a net loss of 6.8 points in 100 rounds, and Harry has 6.5 points in 100 rounds.

To sum up, if you look at it from the Lakers' perspective, then Vincent is definitely willing to send away in the transaction, after all, it is not irreplaceable to the team. But the problem transaction is not two-sided. To be precise, consider the other party’s needs. Obviously, as long as the two are not stupid, they will choose Hachimura.

So, it is almost a foregone conclusion that Hachimura left the Lakers this summer. After all, Pelinka must strengthen the team.

7m cn