102 million in 3 years! Playing as a substitute in the new season, fortunately the Lakers did not trade, it was more than just losing Hachimura Shizuo

In the regular season of the 24-25 season, Hachimura made a total of 576 shots and made a real shooting rate of 61.9%. Just look at the group comparison:

1, Antetokounmpo's value is 62.5%;

2, Porzingis value is 61.8%;

3, Siakam's value is 59.9%.

Through comparison, Hachimura only has the top finishing level in the league. Here, what I want to express is that whether it is mainly investing or accepting investment, at least when opportunities arise, you can effectively seize the opportunity.

brought the Lakers scored 117.1 points in 100 rounds when Hachimura Shizuo was present. For comparison, the Knight's value is 121.0 points and the Thunder's value is 119.2 points. When Hachimura Shizuo was not present, the Lakers scored 112.9 points in a hundred rounds. For comparison, the Trail Blazers' value is 111.0 points and the Jazz' value is 110.2 points.

In other words, when Hachimura Shizuo is on the court, the Lakers have a top offense in the league, and when they are not on the court, they are at the bottom level.

However, the efficiency of Hachimura on the defensive end is very average. In terms of data, the real plus-negative value of defense is -0.9. The value of the defensive "ATM" Beasley is well known -1.2, Valanciunas is -1.1, and Westbrook is -0.8.

In summary, we can define Hachimura's fixed point as "strong offense and weak defense" - compared to ourselves, the stronger the offense end, the more bad the defense end is.

Will the Lakers trade Hachimura Hiroshi?

In my opinion, the possibility of trading is still very high.

First, the Lakers are relatively not short of defense while sitting with Doncic, but are even less likely to lack players with defensive attributes like Smart and Vanderbilt - the premise is that the two must effectively maintain their health.

Second, Hachimura has a contract of US$18 million for one year, which is a contract with a relatively certain transaction value under the expiration contract.

To sum up two points, it has a certain trading value and its characteristics are contrary to the team. If there is a chance to strengthen, Pelinka will definitely be willing to trade.

Speaking of this, something interesting is coming.

According to the NBA China official website: Because there is no progress in trading Grant, the Trail Blazers are expected to let the former play as a substitute in the new season.

It should be noted that some media previously suggested that the Lakers trade Grant with Hachimura and other things. Now it seems that the Lakers have no deal, otherwise it would be as simple as losing Hachimura.

First, contract. Even this summer, Grant still has three years and a 102 million contract.

How powerful is Grant's combat power? The personal efficiency value of

1, 22-23 quarters is 16.0; the

2, 23-24 quarters are 15.4; the

3, 24-25 quarters are 10.9. According to the comparison of the data, it showed a significant downward trend. Considering the existence of 30 years old and no major injuries, it is difficult to play an upward trend in the new season.

Second, transaction value. Individuals are showing a trend of regression, and they are carrying big contracts. Obviously, the Grant trade is not worth much, just like Lavender in the previous Bulls and George in the current 76ers period. In fact, no matter how much there is transaction value, there will be no situation where no one cares about the transaction, resulting in no progress in the transaction.

To sum up two points, as time goes by, it is very likely that Grant will become a garbage contract. The subsequent results are difficult to deal with. The Lakers have a lot of experience with this. You know, Luo Er Deng was in a bad position before, and he was unable to cut it.

Finally, fortunately, for the Lakers, they did not trade Grant, otherwise they would have a negative impact on the team for three years.